Interesting feedback and great to hear this combination works well for
you. Your "would be nice if" would be quite trivial to add, i.e., the
"Project Files" node would contain all the files found in the Maven
root node, not just pom.xml and nb-configuration.xml, as is currently
the case. I.e., a simple plugin could remove the current Project Files
node and replace it with one that contains all those files and we
could also change the definition of the Project Files node within the
Apache NetBeans Git to allow this, so that no plugin at all would be
needed and that this would be the default behavior. In either case,
would be good if you'd add an issue for this so that we can discuss it
further there and implement it together:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NETBEANS/issues

Gj

On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Dawn Raison <[email protected]> wrote:
> FWIW, I'm using it solely for development of a complex JS application, which
> I am slowly migrating over to an Angular paradigm using typescript.
>
> The "project" is maven based, and I use the exec-maven-plugin to fire off
> the JS compilation tasks  - currently by invoking gulp which has tasks to
> package the legacy JS, and compile/webpack the typescript (via
> webpack-stream).
>
> There are a number of niceties that I've noticed pop up, for example an npm
> node appears once you have a package.json with tools to tell you what
> updates are available, and gulp tasks are recognised and are available on
> the relevant context menus.
>
> One "would be nice if" would be the ability to get recognised config files -
> such as tsconfig.json, package.json, gulpfile.js, webpack.config.js, etc
> could be shown in the "project files" node of the project viewer, rather
> than having to use the file tree ;)
>
> Dawn
>
> On 28/12/2017 19:05, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>
> Definitely NetBeans is relevant for JavaScript usage. Best of all, any
> roadblocks you encounter can be fixed by your own pull requests to Apache
> NetBeans on Apache Git.
>
> Gj
>
> On Thursday, December 28, 2017, Thomas Hubschman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As an old time NB user (started sometime between 2000 and 2004) I have
>> been quite devout in my use of NB for all things Java.Â
>>
>> As much as I'd like to have seen a Swing-dominate world, it was
>> JS/HTML/CSS that prevailed.  ;) ;) ;)
>>
>> 20 years later I find that most of my UI work is in Angular, React, or
>> Ember.
>>
>> I have tried on several occasions to use NB for this work, but it doesn't
>> quite seem designed for it. I keep hitting roadblocks.
>>
>> My question is: Is it Practical to use NetBeans for a Modern "Compiled" JS
>> app?Â
>>
>> e.g. ES7 ==> WebPack ==> Babel ==> etc. ==> etc.
>>
>> I have used it when I included Angular libraries in the index.html header
>> directly to great success but since I started having WebPack run things I
>> have had less success. I love the Chrome integration.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> P.S. As a side note I am looking to do some development work on NB. I D/L
>> the repo over the break and am starting to poke around.Â
>
>
> --
>
> Rgds.
> Dawn Raison

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists

Reply via email to