Hi Ernie,
I hear what you're saying about the empty directory. I kept the artifact in the 
src/main and manually copied it to the target/classes tree after the build. 
However, "Run Main Project" tends to rebuild and wipe the "target" sub-tree 
(because I am missing the nb-javac plugin), which then leads to a runtime error 
due to missing artifact. Currently, I going through Maven documentation to 
figure out a way (I recall seeing a Maven plugin somewhere) to copy this file 
from "main/src" to "target/classes" as the last step in the build and I believe 
this will circumvent my issue.
Thanks as always for your insight
    On Thursday, September 17, 2020, 7:47:21 PM GMT+4:30, Ernie Rael 
<err...@raelity.com> wrote:  
 
 On 9/17/2020 5:11 AM, HRH wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The "Simple JavaFX Maven Archetype (Gluon)" template from the "New 
> Projects->Java with Maven" does not create a resource sub-folder under 
> the src subtree, so the developer can store required artifacts (i.e. 
> jpg images,etc.) for the project in that folder. If the artifacts 
> placed in the src directory with the main and the controller source 
> code, the maven does not copy them to the target->classes, hence the 
> developer needs to manually copy
The developer can put the resources where they belong for the maven 
build system when the developer initially adds them.
> these artifacts src->main to the "target->classes" after each build, 
> to avoid runtime errors.
>
> In contrast, the "FXML JavaFX Maven Archetype (Gluon)" template always 
> creates "Other Sources/src/main/resources/${project.package}" tree 
> structure for the artifacts (i.e. fxml, css, images, etc.) and the 
> maven copies them to the "target->classes->${package}" sub-folder.
>
> If possible, it would be great if these two templates create a 
> consistent tree structure.

The FXML project has resources, so it creates the directory and puts the 
resources there; the other project type does not does not have resources 
and so does not create the directory. You're suggesting creating empty 
directories, which SCM will get rid of.

Just create the directory when you need it. (I kind of agree with you, 
but there are so many valid directory structures for a project... The 
SCM issue is the clincher, empty directories do not stay around) If you 
don't know where the resources are supposed to go, then having some 
directory hanging around won't help anyway.

-ernie


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@netbeans.apache.org

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists

  

Reply via email to