Thanks!
Still can’t find my problem as a known bug, so I will submit a bug I guess.   
Wish I could be certain that it isn’t my macOS beta though.

Tom

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 16, 2021, at 9:23 AM, Eric Bresie <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> This is my understanding of things...there are multiple systems involved, one 
> being more committer oriented while the other is more user oriented.  I 
> believe the user oriented one tends to be evaluated and if accepted moves 
> into the other (JSB) oriented.
> 
> For additional information, see some of the below
> 
> https://bugreport.java.com/bugreport/ (external submissions)
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/secure/Dashboard.jspa
> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/general/JBS+Overview
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29379425/where-to-report-issues-of-openjdk-when-youre-not-a-openjdk-developer
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rlewis/BugTracking/OpenJDKBugtTracking.html (from 
> Sun days perspective)
> 
> Hope this helps.
> Eric Bresie
> [email protected]
> 
> 
>> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 3:47 PM Thomas Wolf <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Sorry for this is off-topic subject, but I’m wondering where the most 
>> effective place is to see and report Java bugs?   I see two different 
>> possibilities:
>>      https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/
>> and
>>      https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/
>> 
>> I’m running into what appears to be a macOS-specific one and am having 
>> trouble searching either effectively to see if it’s a known issue.  My 
>> issue?  Pretty straight-forward:  when the user clicks on a button, I change 
>> the cursor to a WAIT cursor, do a long-lasting operation, then set it back 
>> to the DEFAULT cursor.  The first time, all works as expected, but 
>> subsequent clicks on the button don’t change the cursor.  At least on a Mac 
>> (Monterey) running JDK 17.35.  On Ubuntu 20 and Windows 10, it works every 
>> time.
>> 
>> I suppose it could be a Monterey issue - since it’s in late stage beta - but 
>> I don’t have Big Sur to check, so I wanted to at least check the appropriate 
>> bug databases.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Tom
>> 
>> p.s. I also downloaded and tried the Oracle version of 17.35 - same problem.
>> 

Reply via email to