“Though Azul is nice enough to create JRE and JRE + FX packages, you won’t see those from OpenJDK.“
Note: Azul Zulu builds of OpenJDK are builds of OpenJDK. Gj On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 at 03:55, Ernie Rael <err...@raelity.com> wrote: > On 2/13/22 6:08 PM, Scott Palmer wrote: > > > > I haven’t touch Swing in years and I have no plans to use it again. > > JavaFX is the way to go… though there are still a few missing pieces. > > > > Scott > Hi Scott, just wondering in you have any insight into this. > > I fell in love with JavaFX, and was sorely disappointed when ... > > I'm looking for a more sophisticated text package than what seems to be > available with openjfx. I came across > https://github.com/FXMisc/RichTextFX (if that's where I saw it) which > seems to be a loose port and/or feature-full like of the swing text > stuff. Any idea if I'm reading this right? > > I pretty much gave up on JFX when it was dropped, but it does seem to be > in better shape than I could have hoped for. Is FXMisc considered an > integral part of the jfx ecosystem? > > -ernie > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > >
