Hi, > Does this still requires me to change the source code? It looks like it to me though I might be missing something.
You deduced correctly that it would mean introducing a debug line to publish the Object at that time if you are debugging within one of their methods, although if you are doing that you must have a compilable source. If you want to see the current "result" after you have called a method, then you could use reflection to query their class structure and so access the instance you are interested in(assuming that they haven't blocked access). I then apply the JSON method I sent earlier to reveal the inner class instances. > because you used Reply-To-All rather than Reply-To-List. I am using the GMail app and only has a "Reply all". I haven't come across a Reply to List option before. > That I really can't change easily enough. Given the lack of other feedback from the forum, it looks unlikely that there is a built in feature. I suppose someone may have written a NetBeans extension to do this but that is outside my skill set. My suggestions are simply what I have deduced on my own when wanting to expand my debugging skills and can't be bothered to spend hours stepping through code. I have always preferred creating a readable audit trail through the code that I can review and compare with my understanding of what the routine is meant to do! John On Thu, 11 Jan 2024, 12:55 Admin @ Goodun, <ad...@goodunlimited.co.uk> wrote: > Hi John, > > On Tue, 2024-01-09 at 17:00 +0000, John wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Firstly, I believe the etiquette is to always use “Reply All” so that > > the rest of the group is aware of the thread progression. > > Sorry about that. My mail agent (Evolution) didn't recognise your > message as coming from a mail list because you used Reply-To-All rather > than Reply-To-List. > > > > Having said that, I just remembered that I also publish instances of > > classes as JSON (via Googles Gson API, although I assume you could > > use Jackson as well) using the following code > > Does this still requires me to change the source code? It looks like > it to me though I might be missing something. > > I'm debugging my code that runs as an extension to the CMS Joomla, a > huge codebase that I really can't change easily enough. > > I'll be including your code in my own extensions, it looks great. > > Mark > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > >
