Lombok is not support on the latest releases of Java. Ask them to announce
that.

Gj

On Tue, 11 Aug 2026 at 22:22, Tim Mullé <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ok I suspected that is the answer.
>
> I can stay on 30 for now, since we are heavily lombok based and they are
> not ready for jdk27.
>
> Maybe there should be a big migration notice on the Netbeans Download page
> stating that Lombok is currently not supported in NB31? So it jumps out at
> developers? I’m sure I’m not the only one who will run into this.
>
>
> > On Aug 11, 2026, at 4:18 PM, Michael Bien <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On 8/11/26 21:06, Tim Mullé wrote:
> >> Just tried to use 31 on a very large project which works fine under 30
> and lombok 1.18.38.
> >>
> >> Just changing the Netbeans IDE from 30 to 31 causes the javac/lombok
> collisions because I think the `nb-javac` is running against jdk 27? and
> lombok does’t support that yet so the code editor gives lots of warnings on
> any Lombok annotated classes.
> >>
> >> Compiling from the command line still works as usual.
> >>
> >> Is there a fix for 31? I had to revert back to 30 for now.
> >
> > the fix would be lombok adding support for JDK 27.
> >
> > The NetBeans 31 editor uses javac of JDK 27 for language support.
> >
> > NB 30 used the javac of JDK 26. Odd NB versions update the javac.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > michael
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>
> >> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
> >>
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>

Reply via email to