Okay thanks Joe. And I apologize: it seems you have mentioned that before. On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello > > This has been addressed in NiFi 1.x. You can have multiple writers to > various things in parallel and it handles it nicely. > > Thanks > Joe > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:03 PM, James McMahon <jsmcmah...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > We have multiple people working is separate distinct processor groups > under > > a common NiFi instance. As would be expected, they are often making > changes > > to their processor group workflows concurrently. > > > > There are long periods of time where Betty loses any attempted changes > > including reposition of processors, configuration changes, etc because > Timmy > > has made changes in his processor group. The system prompts Betty with a > > synchronization alert message, and when she then closes that pop up alert > > her changes are gone. The message posted to Betty in such circumstances > is: > > > > "This NiFi instance has been updated by 'SMITH TIMMY. Please refresh to > > synchronize the view." > > > > Two related questions: > > 1. why are the changes in a Processor Group impacting the other when > there > > are no dependencies other than the services each may use? > > 2. Is it possible to avoid this with a configuration change? > > 3. does Timmy have to be fired because he keeps getting in Betty's way? > > > > -Jim (yes, Timmy) >
