mathieu

just a matter of finding the chunk of time to knock it out.  perhaps this
evening.

thanks

On Sat, Mar 30, 2019, 11:27 AM Louis-Ferdinand, Mathieu <
mathieu.louis-ferdin...@morganstanley.com> wrote:

> Hi Joe,
>
>
>
> Do you have an idea of the timeline for 1.9.2 RC?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mathieu.
>
>
>
> *From:* Joe Witt [mailto:joe.w...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 27, 2019 11:00 AM
> *To:* users@nifi.apache.org
> *Subject:* NiFi 1.9.1 release contains a bug causing content repos to
> fill...
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> We will work to promptly produce an Apache NiFi 1.9.2 release which will
> correct a regression introduced in the 1.9.1 release.  The issue, NIFI-6150
> has been identified and fixed on master and once further testing confirms
> we're good we'll get the RC going.
>
>
>
> I've updated the release guide to discourage use of 1.9.1 until the fix is
> out.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Joe
>
> ------------------------------
> NOTICE: Morgan Stanley is not acting as a municipal advisor and the
> opinions or views contained herein are not intended to be, and do not
> constitute, advice within the meaning of Section 975 of the Dodd-Frank Wall
> Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. If you have received this
> communication in error, please destroy all electronic and paper copies and
> notify the sender immediately. Mistransmission is not intended to waive
> confidentiality or privilege. Morgan Stanley reserves the right, to the
> extent required and/or permitted under applicable law, to monitor
> electronic communications, including telephone calls with Morgan Stanley
> personnel. This message is subject to the Morgan Stanley General
> Disclaimers available at the following link:
> http://www.morganstanley.com/disclaimers.  If you cannot access the
> links, please notify us by reply message and we will send the contents to
> you. By communicating with Morgan Stanley you acknowledge that you have
> read, understand and consent, (where applicable), to the foregoing and the
> Morgan Stanley General Disclaimers.
>
>

Reply via email to