Data is on the same cluster running ver 1.9. As specific nodes can not be specified in load balance, is using TCP to move data to those specific nodes the best alternative?
My use case is unique, but only a couple nodes of the 5 have an additional nic card where data needs to be sent. thank you On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:23 AM Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > Either way the answer is to use load balanced connections to single node > once data is on the desired cluster. You still cannot send to a ‘specific > node’ but you can to a single node. > > Consider the case where data was split up for various reasons but needs to > be all back together. Load balancing can handle that case beautifully. > Just note in 1.11.1 load balancing has a bug which impacts single node and > partition based load balancing. It will be fixed in a 1.11.2 release asap. > > thanks > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 7:17 AM Bryan Bende <bbe...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Is it actually two separate clusters, or is it S2S from a cluster back >> to itself? >> >> If it's two separate clusters then I don't think there is way to >> restrict it to certain nodes. >> >> If it is S2S back to self, then a load balanced connection would be >> better and you can select "single node" as the option. >> >> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:15 AM Noe Detore <ndet...@minerkasch.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > Hello, >> > >> > I have a 5 node cluster with all nodes receiving data. Using S2S is it >> possible to send that data to a specific node or nodes in the cluster? >> Otherwise, I am looking at using TCP, but are there better alternatives? >> > >> > Thank you >> > Noe >> >
