Hi! On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:47:43 -0400 (EDT), "Robert P. J. Day" wrote: > from the output of a scanning script i have, there are a number of > CONFIG variables that are tested in the linux kernel source but are > not defined anywhere in a Kconfig file: > > >>>>> NILFS_FS_POSIX_ACL > fs/nilfs2/inode.c:312:#ifdef CONFIG_NILFS_FS_POSIX_ACL > fs/nilfs2/inode.c:437:#ifdef CONFIG_NILFS_FS_POSIX_ACL > >>>>> NILFS_POSIX_ACL > fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h:61:#ifdef CONFIG_NILFS_POSIX_ACL > fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h:200:#ifdef CONFIG_NILFS_POSIX_ACL > fs/nilfs2/super.c:192:#ifdef CONFIG_NILFS_POSIX_ACL > >>>>> NILFS_XATTR > fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h:51:#ifdef CONFIG_NILFS_XATTR > fs/nilfs2/super.c:165:#ifdef CONFIG_NILFS_XATTR > > rday
These features are planned but not embarked on. That is the reason why they are left there. When we really implement them, of course, we will declare in the Kconfig file. Thanks for the feedback. Ryusuke Konishi _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://www.nilfs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
