Thanks so much for the update. This is super helpful! I'll give it a try in the next couple of days and let you know how it goes!
Thanks again for getting me all the necessary info! David Blevins wrote: > > > On Sep 15, 2008, at 3:45 PM, rde8026 wrote: > >> >> I'm using the standard lib form a zip file... > > Ok. In terms of general library upgrading, we generate two files > (dependencies.xml and dependencies.txt) that we put inside of every > openejb-*.jar that says what dependencies the jar has. The data is > nested to show a tree view to make it easier to see what dependencies > are pulled in only by third party libraries. > > Here is the top part of dependencies.txt for openejb-core-3.1- > SNAPSHOT.jar: > > activemq-core-4.1.1.jar > activeio-core-3.0.0-incubator.jar > backport-util-concurrent-2.1.jar > activemq-ra-4.1.1.jar > asm-2.2.3.jar > asm-commons-2.2.3.jar > asm-tree-2.2.3.jar > asm-finder-3.1-SNAPSHOT.jar > commons-cli-1.1.jar > commons-collections-3.2.jar > ..... > > So you should only need to remove activemq-core-4.1.1.jar, activemq- > ra-4.1.1.jar and any libraries they depend on, which are activeio- > core-3.0.0-incubator.jar and backport-util-concurrent-2.1.jar. As far > as replacing them, you'll definitely need activemq-core-5.1.0.jar and > activemq-ra-5.1.0.jar. > > > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/activemq/activemq-core/5.1.0/activemq-core-5.1.0.jar > > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/activemq/activemq-ra/5.1.0/activemq-ra-5.1.0.jar > > .. plus their non-optional depenencies. The activemq-core-5.1.0.pom > shows these required deps (versions are in activemq-parent-5.1.0.pom). > > > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/activemq/activeio-core/3.1.0/activeio-core-3.1.0.jar > > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/camel/camel-core/1.3.0/camel-core-1.3.0.jar > > The activeio-core pom lists backport-util-concurrent as a dependency, > but I couldn't find any use of it in their source. I'd try getting by > without it. > > Definitely let us know how it goes. > > -David > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-5.1-support-tp19400471p19504173.html Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
