It would be great to see it - I'm certainly happy to give it a go if you want to post a patch.
Cheers Jon On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Jean-Sébastien Scrève < [email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Actually I'm the one that worked on this migration that Jean-Louis talked > about. I started just few days ago. All seem to work fine except the > Attachement example. > Here is my post on CXF mailing list : > http://www.nabble.com/Migrating-to-CXF-2.2-in-OpenEJB-to23518058.html > It seems we are not able to easily override the Jetty transport factory > anymore. > > I'll be able to work on it again on Thursday or Friday. > > Would you like a temporary patch to have a look at it? > > Best regards, > > Jean-Sébastien Scrève. > > > Jonathan Gallimore-2 wrote: > > > > Hi Jean-Louis, > > > > That's really useful info - I had reached the conclusion that the version > > of > > CXF we're using doesn't support this, but didn't realise that its a > JAX-WS > > 2.1 feature. I did have look through the code and thought it might be > > possible to modify the OpenEJB CXF classes to use methods on the > > superinterface, but haven't really got anywhere with it. I also think > we'd > > run into problems with things on the client side as well. > > > > It would be great to move to a newer version of CXF. I'm looking forward > > to > > seeing how you get on. I'm happy to help in any way I can. > > > > Cheers > > > > Jon > > > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I've done some tests around this topic. > >> I checked over specifications first and I've seen it's a JAX-WS 2.1 > >> feature. > >> > >> By default, the runtime just examines the exact classes referenced from > >> the > >> SEI interface to figure out what classes need to be bound into the JAXB > >> context. A way to change it is to use the JAXB annotation @XmlSeeAlso > >> where > >> it's needed. > >> > >> For example: > >> @WebService > >> public interface BaseService { > >> String echo(String toEcho); > >> } > >> @WebService > >> public interface HelloWorld extends BaseService { > >> String sayHi(String text); > >> } > >> @WebService(serviceName = "HelloWorld") > >> @XmlSeeAlso(value = {BaseService.class}) > >> public class HelloWorldImpl implements HelloWorld { > >> > >> public String sayHi(String text) { > >> return "Hello " + text; > >> } > >> > >> public String echo(String toEcho) { > >> return toEcho; > >> } > >> > >> } > >> > >> But the case is that OpenEJB embeds CXF 2.0.x which does not support > >> JAX-WS > >> 2.1 > >> To support interface inheritance, we have to migrate to CXF 2.1 (min) > >> > >> I've tested it with CXF (standalone) and it works fine. > >> But, we can not change CXF version out of the box in OpenEJB because API > >> has > >> been modified. > >> > >> I'm working with a colleague to get OpenEJB compiling and running with > >> CXF > >> 2.2.1 (lastest version available). > >> > >> First results are expected by the end of this week. > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> Jean-Louis > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> David Blevins wrote: > >> > > >> > Ok, this feature is now in. In OpenEJB 3.1.1 this will work fine: > >> > > >> > @Local > >> > @Remote > >> > @WebService > >> > public interface Everything { > >> > public Object echo(Object o); > >> > } > >> > > >> > public class SuperBean implements Everything { > >> > public Object echo(Object o) { > >> > return o; > >> > } > >> > } > >> > > >> > Careful though as combining @Remote and @Local on the same interface > >> > is still against the spec and won't be portable. It'll work fine in > >> > OpenEJB, but likely nowhere else. > >> > > >> > When using both @Local and @Remote on the same interface, you will > >> > always get the @Local version of the proxy where possible. > >> > > >> > > >> > -David > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> > http://www.nabble.com/Using-Stateless-Bean-as-WebService-and-Remote-Interface-Both-tp22742953p23315250.html > >> Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Using-Stateless-Bean-as-WebService-and-Remote-Interface-Both-tp22742953p23521907.html > Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
