wai wait, good to know it works but as i said it needs some few implementations to be really implemented ;)
will be done tmr ;) for the release we speak about this mounth, maybe dblevins or jlmonteiro can give you more details - Romain 2012/7/5 Borislav Kapukaranov <b.kapukara...@gmail.com> > Thanks for the quick reply! You guys are the most responsive community ever > :) > The fix works - I've passed the failing point and it seems to work quite > well so far. > > Do you know in which OpenEjb released version I will be able to get the > fix? > > Thanks, > Bobby > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > pushed a start of work: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1858 > > > > there is a small mock part but should be fine to let you test > > > > - Romain > > > > > > 2012/7/5 Borislav Kapukaranov <b.kapukara...@gmail.com> > > > > > Here it is: > > > > > > > > > FATAL ERROR: Unknown error in Assembler. Please send the following > stack > > > trace and this message to users@openejb.apache.org : > > > > > > org.apache.xbean.recipe.ConstructionException: Error calling instance > > > factory method: public > > > org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.GenericConnectionManager > > > org.apache.openejb.resource.GeronimoConnectionManagerFactory.create() > > > > > > at > > > > > > org.apache.xbean.recipe.ObjectRecipe.internalCreate(ObjectRecipe.java:307) > > > > > > at > > > org.apache.xbean.recipe.AbstractRecipe.create(AbstractRecipe.java:96) > > > > > > at > > > org.apache.xbean.recipe.AbstractRecipe.create(AbstractRecipe.java:61) > > > > > > at > > > org.apache.xbean.recipe.AbstractRecipe.create(AbstractRecipe.java:49) > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.Assembler.createResource(Assembler.java:1519) > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.Assembler.buildContainerSystem(Assembler.java:396) > > > > > > at > > > > org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.Assembler.build(Assembler.java:319) > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.eclipse.virgo.javaee.web.openejb.initializer.Activator.start(Activator.java:34) > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.BundleContextImpl$1.run(BundleContextImpl.java:711) > > > > > > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native > > > Method) > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.BundleContextImpl.startActivator(BundleContextImpl.java:702) > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.BundleContextImpl.start(BundleContextImpl.java:683) > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.BundleHost.startWorker(BundleHost.java:381) > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.AbstractBundle.resume(AbstractBundle.java:389) > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.Framework.resumeBundle(Framework.java:1131) > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.StartLevelManager.resumeBundles(StartLevelManager.java:559) > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.StartLevelManager.resumeBundles(StartLevelManager.java:544) > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.StartLevelManager.incFWSL(StartLevelManager.java:457) > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.StartLevelManager.doSetStartLevel(StartLevelManager.java:243) > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.StartLevelManager.dispatchEvent(StartLevelManager.java:438) > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.StartLevelManager.dispatchEvent(StartLevelManager.java:1) > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.eclipse.osgi.framework.eventmgr.EventManager.dispatchEvent(EventManager.java:230) > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.eclipse.osgi.framework.eventmgr.EventManager$EventThread.run(EventManager.java:340) > > > > > > Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException: org.objectweb.jotm.Current > > cannot > > > be cast to > > > org.apache.geronimo.transaction.manager.RecoverableTransactionManager > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.apache.openejb.resource.GeronimoConnectionManagerFactory.create(GeronimoConnectionManagerFactory.java:158) > > > > > > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native > > > Method) > > > > > > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown > > > Source) > > > > > > at > > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown > > > Source) > > > > > > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source) > > > > > > at > > > > > > org.apache.xbean.recipe.ObjectRecipe.internalCreate(ObjectRecipe.java:298) > > > > > > ... 22 more > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Bobby > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > > <rmannibu...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > can you share the exact stack please? > > > > > > > > Why are you using the beta? > > > > > > > > - Romain > > > > > > > > > > > > 2012/7/5 Borislav Kapukaranov <b.kapukara...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > I've got a question about handling of the transaction manager in > > > > connection > > > > > factories. > > > > > I'm using openejb-4.0.0-beta2. In the Assembler class , the > > > > > createResource(ResourceInfo serviceInfo) method creates a service > out > > > of > > > > a > > > > > service recipe. > > > > > In case the service is a ResourceAdapter it checks the transaction > > > > manager > > > > > if it is the default Geronimo one or something else and acts > > > accordingly, > > > > > however these checks don't exist in the case where the service is a > > > > > ManagedConnectionFactory. > > > > > In that case I see a connectionManagerRecipe being created with a > > > > hardcoded > > > > > reference to the default GeronimoConnectionManagerFactory which > when > > > > > invoked tries to cast the transaction manager to the Geronimo one. > > > > > In my setup I've changed the transaction manager to one provided by > > > JOTM > > > > > and I get a ClassCast there. > > > > > > > > > > Can the connectionManagerRecipe initialization be more configurable > > in > > > > case > > > > > a user is not using the default transaction manager? > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > > Bobby > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
