Hello,

Your (kind) answers seem to focus on UNIX starter, but again what' the risk
of starting TomEE+ on Windows using tomcat7.exe / tomcat7w.exe for service
registration ?

To clarify my need: I try to make people believe in TomEE+ can be an easy
replacement for Tomcat (and after, lobby for EE feature to be used).
For this, I'm trying to replace Tomcat by TomEE in an app without even
modifying this installer's app (but I can create a media for this app with
TomEE expanded in same dir as Tomcat used to be).
Devil is in details, I don't know if TomEE's registration as a Windows
service can work strictly like Tomcat's, any clue appreciated !



On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
<rmannibu...@gmail.com>wrote:

> not really we hack for endorsed dir for java 7 too (in catalina.sh)
>
> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> *Twitter: @rmannibucau*
> *Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com*
>
>
>
>
> 2012/9/11 David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com>
>
> >
> > On Sep 9, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Alex The Rocker wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I am testing the drop-in replacement of Tomcat by TomEE+ for a server
> > > application running on 64-bit Windows
> > > For the moment, I want minimal changes in this application's installer.
> > >
> > > This application's installer registers the application server as a
> > service.
> > >
> > > I noticed that tomcat7.exe is missing from Windows (ZIP) distribution
> of
> > > TomEE+ 1.0.1, there's TomEE.amd64.exe and a service.bat stuff.
> > >
> > > I am wondering if I would run into a wall by just copying Tomcat
> 7.0.27's
> > > tomcat7.exe into bin/ directory and let the application installer
> > register
> > > the service as if TomEE+ were Tomcat.
> > >
> > > Any opinion?
> > >
> > > What's different between TomEE.amd64.exe & tomcat7.exe, appart form the
> > > exe's name?
> > >
> >
> > Andy Gumbrecht (Cc'ed) made it IIRC.  I know in terms of the
> > ./catalina.sh, the only change we make is adding the -javaagent flag
> which
> > is only required if using OpenJPA as your JPA provider and you want
> runtime
> > JPA enhancement (as opposed to doing it at build time).
> >
> > I suspect that's the main difference, but probably Andy can say for
> > certain.
> >
> >
> > -David
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to