Your reasons sounds enough to change it for me, @others: any other opinion?
if everybody is ok to switch the default (maybe wait a week) please Reinis open a jira to change the default is it ok for you? *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2012/11/1 Reinis Vicups <to...@orbit-x.de> > Hello, > > as I understand it, the standard (out-of-the-box) CXF configuration > expects the root object not to be wrapped in an array. If this is the case, > the standard providers work as expected! I checked this on TomEE by > removing square brackets from an complex object - they do work. > > So my question is - how can solution be writing own providers, if: > > 1. when supplying a single object, JSONProvider formats it as an array > causing CXF to fail during unmarshaling thus being unable to unmarshal > something it marshaled itself. Shouldn't the default config be the way that > CXF is atleast able to unmarshal stuff it itself marshaled just a method > ago? > > 2. default providers work as expected other than in the case when provided > single root object is falsely(?) formatted as an array? > > I am experiencing the very same error and just cannot accept these two > aspects (CXF being unable to unmarshal something it just marshaled itself > and being forced to write own providers only because of one bug(?)) > > br > Reinis > > > On 10/29/2012 06:11 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > >> well you just need to provide your own providers. you can't just override >> this attribute. >> >> here how the conf works: >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.**com/2012/10/04/jax-rsjax-ws-** >> configuration-for-tomee-1-5-0/<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/2012/10/04/jax-rsjax-ws-configuration-for-tomee-1-5-0/> >> >> *Romain Manni-Bucau* >> *Twitter: @rmannibucau >> <https://twitter.com/**rmannibucau<https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> >> >* >> *Blog: >> **http://rmannibucau.**wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*> >> <http://**rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>> >> *LinkedIn: >> **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/**rmannibucau*<http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*> >> *Github: https://github.com/**rmannibucau*<https://github.com/rmannibucau*> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2012/10/29 kcundick <kevcund...@gmail.com> >> >> Great. Thank you for your response. >>> >>> Can you give me more information on how you can set the serializeAsArray >>> to >>> false whether within the openejb-jar.xml file or within the application? >>> >>> Thank you again for your time. >>> >>> Kevin >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://openejb.979440.n4.**nabble.com/Possible-JSON-bug-** >>> in-TomEE-1-5-and-1-5-1-**tp4658328p4658331.html<http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Possible-JSON-bug-in-TomEE-1-5-and-1-5-1-tp4658328p4658331.html> >>> Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >
