> Setting openjpa.RuntimeUnenhancedClasses=2 allows the application to
> run.

Cool; FTR, 2 corresponds to the 'warn' setting. Sorry about the
incorrect setting earlier.

> If i change it to the following and comment out the work around
> openjpa.RuntimeUnenhancedClasses then the application complains that i
> need an agent but still runs as the classes are already enhanced.

In fact, I added the RuntimeUnenhancedClasses property because of a
similar problem that was reported last week that we couldn't narrow
down in time for the release. Hopefully, with the help of your test
project (I got it; thanks!), we can get this resolved properly.

> I emailed you directly with my test app..

Do you want me to keep the test app private, or can I create and check
in a test case from it?

-Patrick

On 8/29/07, ben short <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Setting openjpa.RuntimeUnenhancedClasses=2 allows the application to
> run. I'm using spring with the following loadTimeWeaver on my
> entityManagerFactory...
>
> org.springframework.instrument.classloading.SimpleLoadTimeWeaver
>
> If i change it to the following and comment out the work around
> openjpa.RuntimeUnenhancedClasses then the application complains that i
> need an agent but still runs as the classes are already enhanced.
>
> org.springframework.instrument.classloading.InstrumentationLoadTimeWeaver
>
> I emailed you directly with my test app..
>
> Regards
>
> Ben
>
>
> On 8/29/07, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I download the 1.0.0 source and ran mvn install. It built and
> > > installed ok. I use either the maven enhance plugin or the ant task to
> > > enhance the classes. When I run my simple test app I get the following
> > > exception...
> >
> > Is there any way we could get access to that test application? I kinda
> > suspect some sort of classloader issue, as I can't see how the
> > isManagedType() call would otherwise fail.
> >
> > Also, can you work around it by setting the
> > openjpa.RuntimeUnenhancedClasses property to 'disabled'?
> >
> > > Also i think the following ddl is incorrect..
> > >
> > > CREATE TABLE AttributeAndValue (id INTEGER NOT NULL IDENTITY,
> > > mAttribute VARCHAR(255), mValue VARCHAR(255), version INTEGER,
> > > mProductInstance_id INTEGER, UNIQUE (mValue))
> > >
> > > this is the @Table annotation used on the AttributeAndValue class.
> > >
> > > @Table([EMAIL PROTECTED](columnNames={
> > > "mProductInstance, mAttribute", "mValue"}))
> >
> > IIRC, OpenJPA does not currently support multi-column unique
> > constraints. I think that there is work in progress to resolve this,
> > though.
> >
> > -Patrick
> >
> > On 8/29/07, ben short <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I download the 1.0.0 source and ran mvn install. It built and
> > > installed ok. I use either the maven enhance plugin or the ant task to
> > > enhance the classes. When I run my simple test app I get the following
> > > exception...
> > >
> > > 32  openjpa  INFO   [main] openjpa.Runtime - Starting OpenJPA 1.0.0
> > > 438  openjpa  TRACE  [main] openjpa.jdbc.SQL - <t 9194103, conn
> > > 7143488> executing prepstmnt 25621063 SELECT SEQUENCE_SCHEMA,
> > > SEQUENCE_NAME FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.SYSTEM_SEQUENCES
> > > 438  openjpa  TRACE  [main] openjpa.jdbc.SQL - <t 9194103, conn
> > > 7143488> [0 ms] spent
> > > 438  openjpa  TRACE  [main] openjpa.jdbc.SQL - <t 9194103, conn
> > > 5285449> executing stmnt 6109469 CREATE TABLE AttributeAndValue (id
> > > INTEGER NOT NULL IDENTITY, mAttribute VARCHAR(255), mValue
> > > VARCHAR(255), version INTEGER, mProductInstance_id INTEGER, UNIQUE
> > > (mValue))
> > > 438  openjpa  TRACE  [main] openjpa.jdbc.SQL - <t 9194103, conn
> > > 5285449> [0 ms] spent
> > > 454  openjpa  TRACE  [main] openjpa.jdbc.SQL - <t 9194103, conn
> > > 1067475> executing stmnt 33189144 CREATE TABLE Product (id INTEGER NOT
> > > NULL IDENTITY, version INTEGER)
> > > 454  openjpa  TRACE  [main] openjpa.jdbc.SQL - <t 9194103, conn
> > > 1067475> [0 ms] spent
> > > 454  openjpa  TRACE  [main] openjpa.jdbc.SQL - <t 9194103, conn
> > > 9716945> executing stmnt 21658130 CREATE TABLE ProductInstance (id
> > > INTEGER NOT NULL IDENTITY, version INTEGER)
> > > 454  openjpa  TRACE  [main] openjpa.jdbc.SQL - <t 9194103, conn
> > > 9716945> [0 ms] spent
> > > 454  openjpa  TRACE  [main] openjpa.jdbc.SQL - <t 9194103, conn
> > > 32486590> executing stmnt 2830910 CREATE TABLE Product_ProductInstance
> > > (Product_id INTEGER, mProductInstances_id INTEGER)
> > > 454  openjpa  TRACE  [main] openjpa.jdbc.SQL - <t 9194103, conn
> > > 32486590> [0 ms] spent
> > > 454  openjpa  TRACE  [main] openjpa.jdbc.SQL - <t 9194103, conn
> > > 7858936> executing stmnt 30983464 CREATE INDEX
> > > I_TTRBDVL_MPRODUCTINSTANCE ON AttributeAndValue (mProductInstance_id)
> > > 454  openjpa  TRACE  [main] openjpa.jdbc.SQL - <t 9194103, conn
> > > 7858936> [0 ms] spent
> > > 454  openjpa  TRACE  [main] openjpa.jdbc.SQL - <t 9194103, conn
> > > 10127976> executing stmnt 14900151 CREATE INDEX I_PRDCTNC_ELEMENT ON
> > > Product_ProductInstance (mProductInstances_id)
> > > 454  openjpa  TRACE  [main] openjpa.jdbc.SQL - <t 9194103, conn
> > > 10127976> [0 ms] spent
> > > 454  openjpa  TRACE  [main] openjpa.jdbc.SQL - <t 9194103, conn
> > > 17010151> executing stmnt 32826737 CREATE INDEX I_PRDCTNC_PRODUCT_ID
> > > ON Product_ProductInstance (Product_id)
> > > 454  openjpa  TRACE  [main] openjpa.jdbc.SQL - <t 9194103, conn
> > > 17010151> [0 ms] spent
> > > Exception in thread "main" <openjpa-1.0.0-rType 'svnversion --help'
> > > for usage. fatal user error>
> > > org.apache.openjpa.persistence.ArgumentException: The type "class
> > > com.daisytechnologies.jpatest.ProductInstance" has not been enhanced.
> > >         at 
> > > org.apache.openjpa.meta.ClassMetaData.resolveMeta(ClassMetaData.java:1631)
> > >         at 
> > > org.apache.openjpa.meta.ClassMetaData.resolve(ClassMetaData.java:1605)
> > >         at 
> > > org.apache.openjpa.meta.MetaDataRepository.processBuffer(MetaDataRepository.java:675)
> > >         at 
> > > org.apache.openjpa.meta.MetaDataRepository.resolveMeta(MetaDataRepository.java:575)
> > >         at 
> > > org.apache.openjpa.meta.MetaDataRepository.resolve(MetaDataRepository.java:500)
> > >         at 
> > > org.apache.openjpa.meta.MetaDataRepository.getMetaData(MetaDataRepository.java:302)
> > >         at 
> > > org.apache.openjpa.enhance.ManagedClassSubclasser.setIntercepting(ManagedClassSubclasser.java:264)
> > >         at 
> > > org.apache.openjpa.enhance.ManagedClassSubclasser.prepareUnenhancedClasses(ManagedClassSubclasser.java:157)
> > >         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > >         at 
> > > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> > >         at 
> > > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> > >         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> > >         at 
> > > org.apache.openjpa.kernel.AbstractBrokerFactory.loadPersistentTypes(AbstractBrokerFactory.java:287)
> > >         at 
> > > org.apache.openjpa.kernel.AbstractBrokerFactory.newBroker(AbstractBrokerFactory.java:197)
> > >         at 
> > > org.apache.openjpa.kernel.DelegatingBrokerFactory.newBroker(DelegatingBrokerFactory.java:142)
> > >         at 
> > > org.apache.openjpa.persistence.EntityManagerFactoryImpl.createEntityManager(EntityManagerFactoryImpl.java:192)
> > >         at 
> > > org.apache.openjpa.persistence.EntityManagerFactoryImpl.createEntityManager(EntityManagerFactoryImpl.java:145)
> > >         at 
> > > org.apache.openjpa.persistence.EntityManagerFactoryImpl.createEntityManager(EntityManagerFactoryImpl.java:56)
> > >         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > >         at 
> > > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> > >         at 
> > > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> > >         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> > >         at 
> > > org.springframework.orm.jpa.AbstractEntityManagerFactoryBean$ManagedEntityManagerFactoryInvocationHandler.invoke(AbstractEntityManagerFactoryBean.java:375)
> > >         at $Proxy0.createEntityManager(Unknown Source)
> > >         at com.daisytechnologies.jpatest.Main.insert(Main.java:45)
> > >         at com.daisytechnologies.jpatest.Main.main(Main.java:39)
> > >         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > >         at 
> > > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> > >         at 
> > > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> > >         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> > >         at 
> > > com.intellij.rt.execution.application.AppMain.main(AppMain.java:90)
> > >
> > > But if i use the 0.9.8-SNAPSHOT version without recompiling or
> > > enhancing the classes it works OK.
> > >
> > > The same issue occurred with a postgres setup.
> > >
> > > Also i think the following ddl is incorrect..
> > >
> > > CREATE TABLE AttributeAndValue (id INTEGER NOT NULL IDENTITY,
> > > mAttribute VARCHAR(255), mValue VARCHAR(255), version INTEGER,
> > > mProductInstance_id INTEGER, UNIQUE (mValue))
> > >
> > > this is the @Table annotation used on the AttributeAndValue class.
> > >
> > > @Table([EMAIL PROTECTED](columnNames={
> > > "mProductInstance, mAttribute", "mValue"}))
> > >
> > > Ben
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Patrick Linskey
> > 202 669 5907
> >
>



-- 
Patrick Linskey
202 669 5907

Reply via email to