Hi Catalina,
thank you very much for your quick and helpful answer. Best regards, Lars
2008/4/13, catalina wei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi Lars,
> Want to correct my previous email.
> OpenJPA does have this feature implemented already, an example can be
> found
> in
>
> org.apache.openjpa.persistence.annotations.common.apps.annotApp.annotype.OrderByEntity:
> @PersistentCollection
> @OrderBy
> private List<String> strings = new ArrayList();
>
> If you search for "@PersistentCollection" under
> openjpa-persistence-jdbc/src/test/java folder,
> you will get lots of examples.
>
>
> Catalina
>
>
> On 4/12/08, Janko Heilgeist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > catalina wei wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Lars,
> > > The feature you are looking for has been addressed in the draft
> of JPA
> > > 2.0
> > > spec Section 2.1.5 Collections of Embeddable Classes and Basic Types.
> > > I don't think we have this feature implemented in the current OpenJPA
> > > releases.
> > >
> > > Catalina
> > >
> > > On 4/11/08, Lars Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to persist a object which contains a list of primitives
> > > > (Strings). It is possible or can JPA only store real objects?
> > > >
> > > > I tried it an received an error.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards, Lars
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > Hi,
> >
> > what about @org.apache.openjpa.persistence.PersistentCollection? I've
> > never used it myself, but someone mentioned this feature a few days ago
> on
> > this mailinglist.
> >
> > @Entity
> > public MyObject {
> >
> > @PersistentCollection
> > private Collection<String> users;
> >
> > }
> >
> > It is not standard-JPA, though.
> >
> > Janko
> >
> >
>
