I wish it were that easy aswell.. ;)

The database has, at the time of testing, 200 in wearhouse, 500 in
storagecategory and 10 storage categories in each wearhouse.  I'm running
1.2.x. I gave the latest nightly a go, but had some issues and went back to
1.2 because of the importance of having a working installation for the
project.

Caching is default, so disabled. If i enable caching the first go still
takes just as long, but the next iterations obviously take only a few ms.

Basically it's just plain vanilla, since we cannot be expected to know all
of the frameworks tweaks and possibilities we decided to leave them all
default so we could have an even comparison. Obviously with the exception of
enhancing files for OpenJPA.

We really appreciate the help btw! :)


Kevin Sutter wrote:
> 
> Shubbis,
> Darn, I thought it was going to be an easy "lack of enhancement"
> question...  Your results don't seem to mesh what we have been
> experiencing,
> but let me try to mimic your exact setup and see what I come up with.
> 
> I do see that you are using Eager FetchType.  Is your database fully
> populated?  That is, what number of Wearhouse and StorageContainers are
> you
> running with?  And, have you verified that the FetchType of Eager is
> working
> for all implementations?
> 
> And, what version of OpenJPA are you running with?  1.0.x, 1.2.x, 1.3.x,
> or
> trunk (2.0.x)?  And, any caching parameters at all?  Or, just plain
> vanilla
> out-of-the-box configuration?
> 
> Thanks,
> Kevin
> 
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Shubbis <marius.jo...@broadpark.no>
> wrote:
> 
>>
>> Hi Kevin,
>>
>> Thanks for the reply!
>>
>> We are enhancing the files. I have an Ant script enhancing the files
>> before
>> every run of OpenJPA, so that is not the problem.
>> Although it did give me strange results the first time I tried openjpa
>> and
>> did not enhance ;)
>>
>> -Shubbis
>>
>>
>> Kevin Sutter wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Shubbis,
>> > Thanks for asking before posting any results...  :-)  Much appreciated.
>> >
>> > The first thing that comes to mind is whether you are "enhancing" your
>> > Entities that are used with OpenJPA.  For optimal performance, OpenJPA
>> > uses
>> > a byte-code weaving technique to enhance the Entity objects.  This
>> > enhancement allows for more efficient interaction between the Entity
>> > objects
>> > and the OpenJPA runtime.
>> >
>> > This blog entry explains the various enhancement mechanisms available
>> for
>> > an
>> > OpenJPA environment (build vs runtime):
>> >
>> http://webspherepersistence.blogspot.com/2009/02/openjpa-enhancement.html
>> >
>> > FYI, if you do not perform the byte-code enhancement either statically
>> at
>> > build time or dynamically at runtime, then OpenJPA falls back to a
>> simpler
>> > subclassing approach.  This subclassing approach is meant for simple
>> > out-of-the-box examples, and not for production or performance
>> > comparisons.
>> > This performance concern becomes especially noticeable with Eager type
>> > relationship fetching like it looks your example is doing.
>> >
>> > Let's start with this enhancement processing.  If you are doing
>> > enhancement
>> > and you are still hitting this performance concern, then we need to dig
>> > further because we definitely do not see this type of performance
>> concern
>> > when we do our comparisons...  :-)
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Kevin
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Shubbis <marius.jo...@broadpark.no>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> First post so bare with me, and I've search for quite a while and not
>> >> found
>> >> any answers.
>> >>
>> >> I'm working on a school project where we are testing performance with
>> >> different ORM's compared to JDBC and I'm having a big issue with
>> OpenJPA
>> >> when using a ManyToMany relation.
>> >>
>> >> We're trying to do a simple select case where we run a for loop with
>> 500
>> >> iterations while calling a findById method that returns the instance.
>> >>
>> >> Wearhouse instance = getOJPAEntityManager().find(Wearhouse.class, id);
>> >>
>> >> This takes roughly 1~ sec on JDBC and 1.2~ EclipseLink while it takes
>> 10+
>> >> sec on OpenJPA.
>> >> This only happens with ManyToMany! We have plenty of insert tests,
>> select
>> >> tests etc and all of them are much more similar, with openjpa winning
>> and
>> >> losing a few.
>> >>
>> >> Now, I'll gladly admit we dont have to much experience with this, but
>> >> this
>> >> strikes me as very odd. So, if anyone has any tips, comments or info
>> I'll
>> >> be
>> >> glad to try it out.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks in advance!
>> >>
>> >> Marius
>> >>
>> >> Here are the two entities in question:
>> >>
>> >> package project.common.model;
>> >>
>> >> import java.util.*;
>> >>
>> >> import javax.persistence.*;
>> >>
>> >> @Entity
>> >> public class Wearhouse {
>> >>
>> >>        @Id
>> >>        @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
>> >>        private Integer wearhouseNr;
>> >>        private String wearhouseName;
>> >>
>> >>        @ManyToMany(cascade={CascadeType.PERSIST}, fetch =
>> >> FetchType.EAGER)
>> >>        @JoinTable(
>> >>                        name="wearhouse_storagecategory",
>> >>                        joincolum...@joincolumn(name="wearhouseNr"),
>> >>
>> >>  inversejoincolum...@joincolumn(name="storagecategoryNr")
>> >>        )
>> >>        private List<Storagecategory> storageCategories;
>> >>
>> >>        public Wearhouse() {
>> >>        }
>> >>
>> >>        public Wearhouse(String wearhouseName) {
>> >>                this.wearhouseName = wearhouseName;
>> >>                storageCategories = new ArrayList<Storagecategory>();
>> >>        }
>> >>
>> >>        public Integer getWearhouseNr() {
>> >>                return this.wearhouseNr;
>> >>        }
>> >>
>> >>        public void setWearhouseNr(Integer wearhouseNr) {
>> >>                this.wearhouseNr = wearhouseNr;
>> >>        }
>> >>
>> >>        public String getWearhouseName() {
>> >>                return this.wearhouseName;
>> >>        }
>> >>
>> >>        public void setWearhouseName(String wearhouseName) {
>> >>                this.wearhouseName = wearhouseName;
>> >>        }
>> >>
>> >>        public void setStorageCategories(List<Storagecategory>
>> >> storageCategory){
>> >>                this.storageCategories = storageCategory;
>> >>        }
>> >>
>> >>        public List<Storagecategory> getStorageCategories(){
>> >>                return storageCategories;
>> >>        }
>> >>
>> >>        public void addStorageCategories(Storagecategory
>> storagecategory)
>> >> {
>> >>                if(storageCategories == null)
>> >>                        storageCategories = new
>> >> ArrayList<Storagecategory>();
>> >>                storageCategories.add(storagecategory);
>> >>
>> >>        }
>> >>
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> package project.common.model;
>> >>
>> >> import java.util.*;
>> >>
>> >> import javax.persistence.*;
>> >>
>> >> @Entity
>> >> public class Storagecategory {
>> >>
>> >>        @Id
>> >>        @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
>> >>        private Integer storagecategoryNr;
>> >>        private String storageCategoryName;
>> >>
>> >>        @ManyToMany(mappedBy="storageCategories",
>> >> cascade={CascadeType.PERSIST})
>> >>        private List<Wearhouse> wearhouses;
>> >>
>> >>        public Storagecategory() {
>> >>        }
>> >>
>> >>        public Storagecategory(String storageCategoryName) {
>> >>                this.storageCategoryName = storageCategoryName;
>> >>        }
>> >>
>> >>        public Integer getStoragecategoryNr() {
>> >>                return this.storagecategoryNr;
>> >>        }
>> >>
>> >>        public void setStoragecategoryNr(Integer storagecategoryNr) {
>> >>                this.storagecategoryNr = storagecategoryNr;
>> >>        }
>> >>
>> >>        public String getStorageCategoryName() {
>> >>                return this.storageCategoryName;
>> >>        }
>> >>
>> >>        public void setStorageCategoryName(String storageCategoryName)
>> {
>> >>                this.storageCategoryName = storageCategoryName;
>> >>        }
>> >>
>> >>        public List<Wearhouse> getWearhouses() {
>> >>                return wearhouses;
>> >>        }
>> >>
>> >>        public void setWearhouses(List<Wearhouse> wearhouses) {
>> >>                this.wearhouses = wearhouses;
>> >>
>> >>                //Wearhouse owns the relation, therefor we have to tell
>> >> these
>> >>                //wearhouses this storargecategories is on of the
>> >> wearhouse's
>> >> storagecategories.
>> >>                for (Wearhouse wearhouse : wearhouses)
>> >>                        wearhouse.addStorageCategories(this);
>> >>        }
>> >> }
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >>
>> http://n2.nabble.com/Slow-performance-with-OpenJPA-when-selecting-from-a-ManyToMany-relation.-tp2466994p2466994.html
>> >> Sent from the OpenJPA Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://n2.nabble.com/Slow-performance-with-OpenJPA-when-selecting-from-a-ManyToMany-relation.-tp2466994p2467417.html
>> Sent from the OpenJPA Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n2.nabble.com/Slow-performance-with-OpenJPA-when-selecting-from-a-ManyToMany-relation.-tp2466994p2469415.html
Sent from the OpenJPA Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to