On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Ravi P Palacherla (via Nabble) < ml-user+194843-327306...@n2.nabble.com<ml-user%2b194843-327306...@n2.nabble.com> > wrote:
> Hi Laird, > > I also think that you should get a NON-NULL for e2.gete1() after flush, > provided e2 is managed at the time you are doing e2.gete1(). > Interestingly enough, I have run this using all the persistence providers, and they all give me NULL. I just can't see reading the spec that way, but everyone has, I guess. Let me try your suggestion. Thanks, Laird -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/insertable-updatable-%3D-false-question-tp3439111p3440703.html Sent from the OpenJPA Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
