Thanks, Mike. On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Michael Dick <michael.d.d...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi Christopher, > I haven't verified this is the case, but it looks likely - the testcase for > OPENJPA-843 passes when I use the enhancer. > > It may also be worth noting that we recently changed the default option for > RuntimeUnenhancedClasses from supported to unsupported in OPENJPA-651. The > change affects trunk and 1.3 (IIRC) and was done to try and prevent users > from falling into situations like this one where the unenhanced classes > don't work properly. > > -mike > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Christopher Gardner < > chris.r.gard...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > So if you don't use the PCEnhancer, the full object graph will be > updated? > > Ouch! > > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Christopher Gardner < > > chris.r.gard...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I'm not enhancing the classes in any way. BTW, I'm running outside of > a > > > JEE container. > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Michael Dick < > michael.d.d...@gmail.com > > >wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> That's embarrassing - it's right in the subject.. > > >> > > >> By any chance are you using RuntimeUnenhancedClasses (if you're > running > > >> the > > >> PCEnhancer then you're not and it _should_ all work). If you are then > > >> trying > > >> runtime enhancement might help. > > >> > > >> Sorry for missing the subject earlier. > > >> > > >> -mike > > >> > > >> > > >> Christopher Gardner wrote: > > >> > > > >> > 1.2.1 > > >> > > > >> > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Michael Dick > > >> > <michael.d.d...@gmail.com>wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> Which version of OpenJPA are you using? > > >> >> > > >> >> This sounds like http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-843 > > >> >> OPENJPA-843 . > > >> >> > > >> >> -mike > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> Christopher Gardner wrote: > > >> >> > > > >> >> > No matter what value I set cascade to, the update statement > > prevails. > > >> >> > Here > > >> >> > is the last setting. I've tried every value. > > >> >> > class A { > > >> >> > @ManyToOne(optional = false, cascade = CascadeType.REMOVE) > > >> >> > @JoinColumn(name > > >> >> > = "b_id") > > >> >> > private B b; > > >> >> > } > > >> >> > > > >> >> > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Christopher Gardner < > > >> >> > chris.r.gard...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >> > > > >> >> >> What value of the cascade type do you set? > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:42 PM, C N Davies <c...@cndavies.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >>> I just set cascade type on the field that I don't update but > want > > >> the > > >> >> >>> join > > >> >> >>> to be persisted. > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- > > >> >> >>> From: Christopher Gardner [mailto:chris.r.gard...@gmail.com] > > >> >> >>> Sent: Saturday, 22 August 2009 3:25 AM > > >> >> >>> To: users@openjpa.apache.org > > >> >> >>> Subject: Superfluous Updates for a @ManyToOne in OpenJPA 1.2.1 > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> Class A has a unidirectional many-to-one relationship with > Class > > B. > > >> >> I > > >> >> >>> change a property on a Class A object and persist the object. > > The > > >> >> log > > >> >> >>> shows > > >> >> >>> SQL update statements called for both A and B. I have no > cascade > > >> >> >>> options > > >> >> >>> set on A's @ManyToOne. I do not want any updates to B because > > it's > > >> >> not > > >> >> >>> logical to do so and it's inefficient. B represents standard, > > >> >> >>> boilerplate > > >> >> >>> data for many A's. Also, it adds no value for B to know about > A. > > >> No > > >> >> >>> update > > >> >> >>> is appropriate in this context. How do I stop updates to B? > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> -- > > >> >> View this message in context: > > >> >> > > >> > > > http://n2.nabble.com/Superfluous-Updates-for-a-ManyToOne-in-OpenJPA-1-2-1-tp3492419p3492691.html > > >> >> Sent from the OpenJPA Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> -- > > >> View this message in context: > > >> > > > http://n2.nabble.com/Superfluous-Updates-for-a-ManyToOne-in-OpenJPA-1-2-1-tp3492419p3492745.html > > >> Sent from the OpenJPA Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >> > > > > > > > > >
