We have also released a geronimo-jpa_1.0_spec-1.1.2.jar which is
identical to the latest geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1.1.jar to help clarify
this situation, in case there is ever a JPA 3.0 spec.....
-Donald
Michael Dick wrote:
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
Short answer : this is normal.
Explanation : The orginal version of the geronimo-jpa spec jars was copied
from the EJB specification (version 3.0 at the time). So JPA 1.0 was named
geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.0.jar in Geronimo.
With JPA 2.0 the name changed to geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-xxx. I believe this
is the 'more correct' format for the name, but it's really a question for
the geronimo folks.
Hope this helps,
-mike
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Jean-Baptiste BRIAUD -- Novlog <
j-b.bri...@novlog.com> wrote:
Hi,
the version of Geronimo look older in OpenJPA 2 compared to OpenJPA 1.2.1
...
One can found geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0-EA8-20090902.182716-4.jar in
OpenJPA 2
and geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.0.jar in OpenJPA 1.2.1.
Is it normal ? What are the differences ?
