Although this "benchmark" is obviously biased, it's still good to be reminded of potential pitfalls and/or inconsistencies. For example, I took a quick look at one set of results and it seems to indicate a repeating issue with obtaining a primary key sequence from the OpenJPA sequence table. This could be a problem with the application, or it could be a problem with the OpenJPA processing. Digging in a bit on these type of issues would probably be worthwhile.
But, spending a lot of time attempting to match the results of ObjectDB is probably not that interesting... Kevin On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Georgi Naplatanov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi gkorland. > > Do not trust on this tests. It is better to make your own test and then > decide which implementation is good for you. > > My testing indicates that OpenJPA (with or without cache) is faster than > Hibernate on mostly write and less read operations. > > On read operation probably all JPA implementation are very close due the > cache. > > Best regards > Georgi > > > gkorland wrote: > >> Did anyone review the JPAB (http://www.jpab.org/) results? It seems like >> all the other JPA guys are running faster and even better... >> > >
