This should be explained in our user manual. It'd be nice to reduce the number of warning messages, and make them a little more friendly too.
I've opened a JIRA : OPENJPA-2047<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2047>to address the documentation, and look into a better way to log this condition. -mike On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 11:45 AM, ljnelson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Michael Dick [via OpenJPA] < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Typical applications will interact with entities (PersistenceCapable > > classes) through the accessor and mutator methods anyway, so any > > modifications should be a no-op. But the potential for modification is > > there. > > > Thanks. > > Best, > Laird > > -- > http://about.me/lairdnelson > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/Running-PCEnhancer-on-a-pile-of-classes-that-are-not-all-entities-tp6759518p6764636.html > Sent from the OpenJPA Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
