> that this just sounds like a bug... "OpenJPA allows a java.util.List type field to maintain order without any further annotation across persistence context" -- and that is a bug!
Spec says that list ordering is not portable -- spec does not prohibit a vendor to provide features. So what is the bug here? ----- Pinaki Poddar Chair, Apache OpenJPA Project -- View this message in context: http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/Removal-of-unnecessary-Order-By-clauses-tp7315925p7330422.html Sent from the OpenJPA Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
