nice :)
thanks for your hints. But i seem unable to apply the plugin cfg to my
setup successfully:
i added the following cfg, changing the execution phase to
process-test-classes, as the
enhencement is only needed for entities needed in unit tests:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>openjpa-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.2</version>
<configuration>
<includes>org/activiti/standalone/jpa/*.class</includes>
<addDefaultConstructor>true</addDefaultConstructor>
<enforcePropertyRestrictions>true</enforcePropertyRestrictions>
<persistenceXmlFile>src/test/resources/META-INF/persistence.xml</persistenceXmlFile>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>enhancer</id>
<phase>process-test-classes</phase>
<goals>
<goal>enhance</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.openjpa</groupId>
<artifactId>openjpa</artifactId>
<version>2.0.1</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</plugin>
the plugin is unable to find the entities listed in the persistence.xml:
[INFO] --- openjpa-maven-plugin:1.2:enhance (enhancer) @ activiti-engine ---
38 activiti-jpa-pu INFO [main] openjpa.Tool - No targets were given.
Running on all classes in your persistent classes list, or all metadata
files in classpath directories if you have not listed your persistent
classes. Use -help to display tool usage information.
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 3.623s
[INFO] Finished at: Wed Aug 08 21:52:30 CEST 2012
[INFO] Final Memory: 15M/250M
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.codehaus.mojo:openjpa-maven-plugin:1.2:enhance (enhancer) on project
activiti-engine: Execution enhancer of goal
org.codehaus.mojo:openjpa-maven-plugin:1.2:enhance failed:
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.activiti.standalone.jpa.IntegerIdJPAEntity -> [Help 1]
what i am missing for that plugin?
Thanks
Chris
On 8 August 2012 20:22, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> yikes, that means you use subclassing.
>
>
> I recommend to use the openjpa-maven-plugin to enhance the classes at
> build time already.
>
> Here is a sample which you can look at
>
> https://github.com/struberg/lightweightEE/blob/master/backend-api/pom.xml
>
> We still need to polish our own documentation, but the parameters are
> almost the same as in the old version which you can find at [1].
> The openjpa-maven-plugin is not part of OpenJPA itself since 2.2.0.
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> [1] http://mojo.codehaus.org/openjpa-maven-plugin/usage.html
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Chris Joysn <[email protected]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2012 7:04 PM
> > Subject: Re: Annotations removed when enhancing?
> >
> > well... i am not so an experienced OpenJPA user but i can provide the
> > following information:
> >
> > before merging the entity to an persistence context the class of the
> entity
> > looks like:
> >
> > org.activiti.standalone.jpa.FieldAccessJPAEntity@4260ab
> >
> > after the merge it looks like:
> >
> > org.apache.openjpa.enhance.org
> > $activiti$standalone$jpa$FieldAccessJPAEntity$pcsubclass@df88d2
> >
> > when performing an
> >
> > private boolean isEntityAnnotationPresent(Class<?> clazz) {
> > return (clazz.getAnnotation(Entity.class) != null);
> > }
> >
> > the Entity.class annotation is found before the merge, not not after the
> > merge.
> >
> > And when subclassing is bad, how can i get rid of it?
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > On 8 August 2012 15:55, Kevin Sutter <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> > What way of enhancement do you use in your project?
> >> > If you use subclassing, then the generated subclass is probably
> > without
> >> annotations.
> >>
> >> And, if you are using subclassing, then quit using subclassing! :-)
> >> Nobody that is serious about their application should be using
> subclassing
> >> support. I've even been throwing around the idea of removing the
> >> subclassing support altogether since it can cause more issues than it
> >> resolves... But, that's a whole separate discussion...
> >>
> >> Kevin
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Kevin is right. I re-checked it now as well. At least for build-time
> >> > enhanced entities the annotations remain on the class and fields. We
> > do
> >> not
> >> > use method annotations, so I cannot check this quickly.
> >> >
> >> > What confused me earlier is that jad (java decompiler) doesn't
> > seem to
> >> > show annotations in general. But looking at the hex dump of the class
> >> file
> >> > itself clearly shows that they are there.
> >> >
> >> > What way of enhancement do you use in your project?
> >> > If you use subclassing, then the generated subclass is probably
> > without
> >> > annotations.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > LieGrue,
> >> > strub
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > > From: Kevin Sutter <[email protected]>
> >> > > To: [email protected]
> >> > > Cc:
> >> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2012 5:21 PM
> >> > > Subject: Re: Annotations removed when enhancing?
> >> > >
> >> > > I'm curious why you think that the annotations are
> > removed... Even
> >> after
> >> > > enhancement is performed, OpenJPA parses the entity classes to
> > get the
> >> > ORM
> >> > > data, which is normally specified via annotations. Do you have
> > an
> >> > example?
> >> > >
> >> > > Kevin
> >> > >
> >> > > On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Chris Joysn
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> well.. unfortunately a framework relies on it to detect JPA
> >> > entities... i
> >> > >> think there is no other way to detect in a reliable way JPA
> > entities?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> LieGrueZuRue
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On 5 August 2012 19:52, Mark Struberg
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > Having code relying on @Entity is bitter so to say ;)
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > All JPA functions could also be added via XML, without
> > having any
> >> > >> > annotation on your entities...
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Such code would btw also not work in Hibernate if you
> > use proxies.
> >> > >> Becasue
> >> > >> > the generated proxies don't have annotations
> > neither.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > LieGrue,
> >> > >> > strub
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > >> > > From: Chris Joysn <[email protected]>
> >> > >> > > To: [email protected]
> >> > >> > > Cc:
> >> > >> > > Sent: Sunday, August 5, 2012 7:19 PM
> >> > >> > > Subject: Annotations removed when enhancing?
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > Hello,
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > is it possible that entities do not get their
> > annotations removed
> >> > > when
> >> > >> > > OpenJPA is performing its enhancements?
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > unfortunately some code relies on the fact that
> > eg. @Entity is
> >> > > present
> >> > >> on
> >> > >> > > classes, but this annotation gets removed by
> > OpenJPA.
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > thanks
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
