hi,
OpenJPA 2.4.2, TomEE 7.0.3
i have another problem with multiple persistence units...
my persistence.xml looks like this:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<persistence xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/persistence_2_0.xsd";
version="2.0">
<persistence-unit name="file">
<jta-data-source>file</jta-data-source>
<class>uk.me.kissy.file.entities.jpa.Box</class>
<class>uk.me.kissy.file.entities.jpa.Category</class>
<class>uk.me.kissy.file.entities.jpa.CqsReview</class>
<class>uk.me.kissy.file.entities.jpa.Department</class>
<class>uk.me.kissy.file.entities.jpa.Enclosure</class>
<class>uk.me.kissy.file.entities.jpa.Event</class>
<class>uk.me.kissy.file.entities.jpa.EventData</class>
<class>uk.me.kissy.file.entities.jpa.EventType</class>
<!-- <class>uk.me.kissy.file.entities.jpa.File</class> -->
<class>uk.me.kissy.file.entities.jpa.Log</class>
<class>uk.me.kissy.file.entities.jpa.Note</class>
<class>uk.me.kissy.file.entities.jpa.Payment</class>
<class>uk.me.kissy.file.entities.jpa.Price</class>
<class>uk.me.kissy.file.entities.jpa.Undertaking</class>
<class>uk.me.kissy.file.entities.jpa.UndertakingType</class>
<class>uk.me.kissy.file.entities.jpa.Workflow</class>
<properties>
<property name="openjpa.jdbc.SynchronizeMappings"
value="buildSchema(ForeignKeys=true)" />
</properties>
</persistence-unit>
<persistence-unit name="operator">
<jta-data-source>operator</jta-data-source>
<class>uk.me.kissy.file.entities.jpa.operator.Address</class>
<class>uk.me.kissy.file.entities.jpa.operator.Client</class>
<class>uk.me.kissy.file.entities.jpa.operator.Council</class>
<class>uk.me.kissy.file.entities.jpa.operator.Operator</class>
<class>uk.me.kissy.file.entities.jpa.operator.Posttown</class>
<class>uk.me.kissy.file.entities.jpa.operator.Wtr_auth</class>
</persistence-unit>
</persistence>
but when i start the container the tables from operator are generated
inside the file database. is there some way to stop this from happening?
also, is OpenJPA deprecated? there doesn't seem to be any activity on
here any more?
