Andrea Maschio wrote: > Hi all, > creating a sort of overlay of a wms with opacity set to > 0.something would be a good replacement for a WFS layer? I am having big > troubles displaying a big WFS layer so was thinking at this possibility.
It works fine. There a couple of potential downsides: o Any SLD_BODY parameter will run into HTTP GET length restrictions pretty quickly. o With a WFS layer, the attributes for the features can be available client-side, whereas WMS requires a separate GetFeatureInfo round trip. --David Gadbois _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/users
