Hi, what would people think about the following:
layer.projection -> the SRS to use in OpenLayers internally layer.params.SRS (or layer.params.CRS etc.) -> the SRS to send to the server Currently, we overwrite params.SRS/CRS/... with layer.projection. Nobody says we have to. Opinions? Regards, Andreas. On Jul 26, 2010, at 00:02 , Anne Blankert wrote: > > Hello Arnd, > > An option named "sphericalmercatoralias" is indeed very specific to > sphericalmercator. > Maybe, an option named "projection" is not specific enough. Users could > think that such an option would somehow magically allow reprojecting the > overlay projection to the map projection. Things would get mixed up, when > sending bounding box coordinates using the wrong projection. > So maybe an option named "projectionalias" would be a better name than > "sphericalmercatoralias" or "projection"? > "projectionalias" stresses the fact that the projection itself should not be > different, just the code that is being used for the projection. > > Anne > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/SphericalMercator-and-SRS-aliases-epsg-900913-epsg-3857-epsg-3785-epsg-102113-tp5311417p5336039.html > Sent from the OpenLayers Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Andreas Hocevar OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org/ Expert service straight from the developers. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/users
