Yup, here's the quote from the same URL : "The tagger is licensed under the GNU General Public License (v2 or later). Source is included. Source is included. The package includes components for command-line invocation, running as a server, and a Java API. The tagger code is dual licensed (in a similar manner to MySQL, etc.). Open source licensing is under the full GPL, which allows many free uses. For distributors of proprietary software, commercial licensing with a ready-to-sign agreement is available. If you don't need a commercial license, but would like to support maintenance of these tools, we welcome gift funding. "
-Jeyendran -----Original Message----- From: John Stewart [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2012 11:43 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: OpenNLP vs StanfordNLP Different licenses. On Dec 2, 2012 1:25 PM, "György Chityil" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > Been playing with both OpenNLP and StanfordNLP ( > http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/tagger.shtml), and it seems to me > they overlap on several grounds. Any plans for joining forces? :) > > Cheers > > -- > Gyuri > 274 44 98 > 06 30 5888 744 >
