Short answer: no :) Longer answer: You don't seem to be using the actual OpenNLP UIMA components.
If you want an example (in Groovy, but should be trivial to transfer to Java) on how to use the OpenNLP UIMA components with uimaFIT, see here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/UIMA/uimaFIT+and+Groovy Cheers, -- Richard > On 19.04.2016, at 16:07, Rui Lopes <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I’m trying to use OpenNLP uima to build a very simple pipeline: > > CollectionReaderDescription reader = CollectionReaderFactory > > .createReaderDescription(AbstractCollectionReader.class, > AbstractCollectionReader.PARAM_VALUE, 33); > > AnalysisEngineDescription tokenizer = > AnalysisEngineFactory.createEngineDescription(SimpleTokenizer.class, > "opennlp.uima.SentenceType", > "pt.ipb.pos.type.Sentence", "opennlp.uima.TokenType", > "pt.ipb.pos.type.Token"); > > > AnalysisEngineDescription ae = > AnalysisEngineFactory.createEngineDescription(GetStartedQuickAE.class); > > SimplePipeline.runPipeline(reader, tokenizer, ae); > > > ------ > The GetStartedQuickAE just prints the Annotations: > > @Override > public void process(JCas jCas) throws AnalysisEngineProcessException { > System.out.println(jCas.getDocumentText()); > > for(Annotation a : jCas.getAnnotationIndex()) { > System.out.println(a); > } > > System.out.println("Done"); > > > } > > > ——— > The output is: > > > Apr 19, 2016 3:04:46 PM opennlp.uima.tokenize.AbstractTokenizer initialize(71) > INFO: Initializing the OpenNLP Simple Tokenizer annotator. > Apr 19, 2016 3:04:46 PM opennlp.uima.util.AnnotatorUtil > getOptionalParameter(440) > INFO: opennlp.uima.IsRemoveExistingAnnotations = not set > Apr 19, 2016 3:04:46 PM opennlp.uima.util.AnnotatorUtil > getOptionalParameter(440) > INFO: opennlp.uima.SentenceType = pt.ipb.pos.type.Sentence > Apr 19, 2016 3:04:46 PM opennlp.uima.util.AnnotatorUtil > getOptionalParameter(440) > INFO: opennlp.uima.TokenType = pt.ipb.pos.type.Token > This article aims to observe the didactic action and its epistemological > insertion in education trends as well as its role as a medium capable of > causing changes in this alignment. Main objective is the need to consciously > integrate between epistemology and education trends didactic application. The > methodological procedure trend the application relied on observations from > years in which the subjects were given Cytology and Histology in > undergraduate courses. The results of observations point to a single > procedure, with little clarity regarding the alignment epistemology, > educational trends, teaching action. Associate art practice can provide a > biological alternative capable of generating a position and "profitable > shifts" in epistemological and pedagogical articulating. Different strategies > need to be created to establish conditions that allow the configuration of > knowledge as a whole, while respecting cultural diversity in which knowledge > is configured. > DocumentAnnotation > sofa: _InitialView > begin: 0 > end: 969 > language: "x-unspecified" > > Done > > > There is only one Annotation? Does anyone knows why? > > Thanks for any feedback! > > All the best, > > Rui Lopes >
