Now /that's/ interesting. Who would've guessed that? :-)
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:15:16 -0800, Norman Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you for all the interesting responses. > It turns our that I had a bad memory chip at the > upper end of the RAM. Even so, I was able to download > correctly with Netscape, while InternetExploerer always > downloaded with a different md5sum (I suppose that Netscape > did not use the upper memory chip!). > > I was tipped off to this by one of Microsoft's autmoated > responses to a system crash. I ran their Mem Test utility, > and this pin-pointed the problem. > > Norm > > > On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 12:56 -0800, Norman Goldstein wrote: > > >> I downloaded > >> > >> OOo_1.1.4_Win32Intel_install.zip > >> > >> from a couple of diffeent sites, and winzip > >> complained of wrong crc's on some of the > >> files in the zip. The log of the extraction is > >> attached. > >> > >> Is this a real problem? I have not > >> used md5sum to verify the zip file. > >> > >> I am doing this under Windows XP. > >> Is open office more stable under Windows 2000? > >> > >> Thank you. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- -hackmiester EAT IT!! http://www.hackmiester.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
