On 03/13/2010 05:04 PM, NoOp wrote: > On 03/12/2010 07:17 PM, Daniel Lewis wrote: >> NoOp wrote: > ... >>> Cor, can you test this with your 3.1x version? I'm sick (bad cold) and >>> can't seem to locate my old 3.1x downloads at the moment. >>> >>> Gary >>> >> Earlier I mentioned that I could not open the document properly >> using 3.2.0 on Ubuntu. (I use the *.deb installation files from the OOo >> web site.) The Build is 320m12 (build: 9483). So there is no difference >> between the m11 and m12 versions. The table in the .doc file is not >> preserved when the file is opened. >> I also have a developer snapshot on my computer OOo-dev 3.30 >> [DEV300m72(build9484). > It will open the Table VI-3.doc file >> and preserve the table. There were a couple of cells which needed a >> minor adjustment in width. I also saved this .doc file as an .odt >> file. Then I opened the .odt file using 3.2.0, and the file opened with >> the table in tact. >> So, whatever the problem, they seem to have solved it in the >> developer snapshots. > > No. The issue is still there. I just tested the .odt with OOo 3.3.0 > M75-dev, saved it to a doc & the table does not remain intact. Also > tested with M69-dev - same results (all linux). > > Found a machine with 3.1.1. on it - windows - and the table is preserved > (again albeit with some slight formating errors). Found the archive > mirror & downloading 3.1.1 linux (all standard OOo) and will test with > that as well. I suspect the results will be the same (works with 3.1.1 > but not with 3.2 or 3.3). > > I'll file a bug on Monday if I'm feeling better by then. > > Gary
Just tested w/OOo 3.1.1 (standard) linux OOO310m19 Build:9420 and the table is preserved. So the issue is a definite regression from 3.1.1. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.org
