Although the bata version(s) of 2.0 that I have played with on Linux
seem pretty cool -- the huge improvement in the Mac product over the
X-windows version is enough to make me happy. Obviously the folks
doing the work to port OOo and create the mac interface have to wait
for a reasonably stable release before they can move ahead, so the
neo office version will always be behind the "regular" version.
I am sure this is a silly question, but why do you want bata
versions? -- I would have thought that a stable release would be
preferable for daily use.
Andy
Spitfire Computer Services
441 Beaver Street
Suite 202
Sewickley, PA 15143
Phone (412) 749-0162
Fax: (412) 749-0203
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.spitcomp.com
On Jun 20, 2005, at 10:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is not very clear from that page that the X11 version is at
OOo1.1.2 and the NeoOffice/J one is at OOo1.1.4.
Besides, there are no links to beta versions...
JC helary
On 2005/06/20, at 23:39, G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 10:28 -0400, Andrew Fisk wrote:
Take a look at neo office/j (http://www.neooffice.org/) -- This
is a
much more mac like version of OpenOffice than the X-windows version
-- give it a try.
For the record, both are offered via the Downloads tab and link on
www.openoffice.org. Mac users should check what is available often.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
