Uwe wrote:

>This is uncomfortable,

Your options are:

a) Use a tool that is known to cause , and will cause _all_ your data
results to be invalid.  (A spreadsheet)

b) Learn a new tool.  (A database.)

Pick option A, and explain to your oversight committee why your data is corrupt.

[At least the Human Genome Project got to publish a paper explaining
why 25% of their data  was invalid.  They couldn't tell you which 25%
it was, though.]

xan

jonathon
-- 
A Fork requires: 
   Seven systems with:
       1+ GHz Processors
       2+ GB RAM
       0.25 TB Hard drive space

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to