Uwe wrote: >This is uncomfortable,
Your options are: a) Use a tool that is known to cause , and will cause _all_ your data results to be invalid. (A spreadsheet) b) Learn a new tool. (A database.) Pick option A, and explain to your oversight committee why your data is corrupt. [At least the Human Genome Project got to publish a paper explaining why 25% of their data was invalid. They couldn't tell you which 25% it was, though.] xan jonathon -- A Fork requires: Seven systems with: 1+ GHz Processors 2+ GB RAM 0.25 TB Hard drive space --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]