Not so. But I didn't see anyone so committed to their suggestions for improvements that they offered to (help) rewrite the documentation.

All this "intellectual discussion" was doing was contribute to global warming. Metaphorically speaking, of course.

DT

ken green wrote:
On 2005-09-13 11:13 AM, Doug Thompson wrote:

Third, anyone who thinks this suggestion is any more outrageous than any of the others for correcting the problem of willful ignorance has a very narrow view of the problem.


Not really into open-minded intellectual discussion or debate, eh?


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to