Mark Greenbank wrote:
Hi Gordon,
That's not a great answer, I'm afraid.
Given that columns can build up rather quickly (especially formula columns
which aren't as neatly represented in a database) I'd one could just as
easily suggest that any program that has this kind of hard-coded limitation
rather than using dynamic memory allocation is not well designed.
Mark
On 2/13/06, Gordon Burgess-Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
gottfried schmitt wrote:
Hello!
I am a user of excel so far, which is limited in number of columns. Does
calc present the possibility of higher column number?
Thanks for your answer.
Gottfried Schmitt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not AFAIK....If you absolutely NEED more than 256 columns then I suggest
that your data is far too big for a spreadsheet and that you would be
far better off using a database.....
--
Registered Linux User no 240308 gordonATgbpcomputingDOTcoDOTuk to email
me remove the obvious!
Rotate the sheet 90º or 270º :)
MS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
