Did somebody found out why latest devel builds are named 2.0.1, not 2.0.4? For example here http://download.openoffice.org/680/index-nojs.html
> -----Original Message----- > From: James Mckenzie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 12:56 AM > To: users@openoffice.org > Subject: RE: [users] 2.0.5 vs 2.1 vs 2.x - how they are > related to each other? > > Krill: > > I don't know. The builds I work with are from > ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org. > > I will check them to see what Maho named them. > > BTW, do not use these builds in a production environment. > They are for TESTING only and may have serious problems. > > James M. > > -----Original Message----- > >From: "Kirill S. Palagin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: Aug 24, 2006 12:16 PM > >To: users@openoffice.org > >Subject: RE: [users] 2.0.5 vs 2.1 vs 2.x - how they are > related to each other? > > > >Final question - I see "OOo_2.0.1_Win32Intel_install.exe" > dated by 16th > >of august at > >ftp://ftp.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/openoffice/developer/OOD680_m1/ > > > >How come it is named as 2.0.1? > > > >Thanks. > >WBR, > >K. Palagin. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
