I run OOo on a Windows XP OS with 256 MB of memory, and for the most part, everything works fine. With large documents, though, like the OP was talking about (I recall 200 pages), I'm not surprised that things would tend to bog down.
--- Donald H Locker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My experience is that WinXP by itself is barely > usable with less than > 512MB RAM on a fairly lightly loaded machine. I > wouldn't try OOo with > less than 1GB, myself. (Though my work machine is > only 512MB, and I use > it there, it is pretty slow; and the machine is > fairly busy otherwise.) > > Donald. > > Kirill S. Palagin wrote: > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: [email protected] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 9:18 AM > >>To: [email protected] > >>Subject: Re: [users] Writer > >>For as little memory s you have, the time you > reported is about par. > >> > >>OOo 2.0 on WinXP needs at least 1 GB RAM > > > > > > This statement is incorrect. 256MB of RAM is fine > for not overly complex > > documents, unless user runs other memory hogs at > the same time. > > Also please see > > > http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_20.html > , where 128 > > MB is stated minimum. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
