On Saturday 14 October 2006 7:48 am, Kirill S. Palagin wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Andy Pepperdine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006 1:15 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [users] Appropriate Purpose and Use > > already using it, and the more we get, the better understood > > will be the need for standard file formats. > > What really should be better understood is the need to work on improving > OpenOffice. > Fanboyism will get you only so far promoting out lovely product. > Gladness with OO will quickly wear off once user looses data because of > illogical behavior .
hopefully you are not implying that things should work exactly like another product that is closed source or it is illogical... Certainly you are not implying that there is only one logical way to do things. It is logical to read the documentation so you understand how the thing works. This list would have 50% less trafic if people did just that. Even the state requires you to read the drivers manual before taking a driving test. It is logical that eveyone understood WHO owns your data.. In my case I do It was logical for me to move to linux 5 years ago.. It was logical to get rid of the 3 finger solute, it was logical to not agree with the EULA.. It is not logical to me why anyone would sign a rediculus EULA, and turn your data and your machine over to someone else.. Fred > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
