Since MS new formats are based on XML, wouldn't that be a good thing? Wouldn't it be much easier for developers of OpenOffice.org to write MS Office-OpenOffice.org file converters so that the converted file looks exactly like the original? And if (yes, I said "if") MS XML format proves to be better than odt, users of future versions of OpenOffice.org probably could save in that format if they want to. If conversions between MS Office and OpenOffice.org file formats were 100% accurate, which I think COULD happen with that new MS format, wouldn't this be an advantage for OpenOffice.org? I mean, as it is now, some people might not want to switch to OpenOffice.org, because they really need to edit MS Office files and they need them to look exactly the same wether they save them with OpenOffice.orgor MS Office.
Johnny Andersson
