Well, "transpose" appears to simply take an array of say, 10 X 20, and make it 
a 20 X 10. I believe my only solution is to write a routine to automate the 
process, or spend a couple of hours cutting, pasting, and copying.

Thanks for the suggestion, though.
Lisa

-----Original Message-----
>From: Ennio-Sr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Dec 1, 2006 7:42 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [users] database-style spreadsheet
>
>Hi, Lisa, sorry to disturb you privately ...
>I'm re-forwarding directly to you my answer (originally sent to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]) as I suspect you didn't see it and I'm curious to know
>if that is a solution to your problem :-)
>
>----------------
>
>* Lisa Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [251106, 18:52]:
>> These are bird survey records. Each row is a species, each column is a 
>> different survey. So, with 100 different species and 50 different surveys, 
>> there are 50 data points for each species, the data point being the number 
>> of individuals of that species seen on that survey, and they are all on a 
>> single line (row), yielding a data range of 100 X 50 cells. I need to 
>> convert to a database format in which each data point is on a separate line 
>> (row). This will yield a data range of 5000 X 3 cells. The 3 column headings 
>> in this case would be species, number of birds, survey number, corresponding 
>> to the row heading, data point and column heading.
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> >From: Dan Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >Sent: Nov 25, 2006 4:23 AM
>> >To: users@openoffice.org
>> >Subject: Re: [users] database-style spreadsheet
>> >
>> >On Friday 24 November 2006 09:54 pm, Lisa Hardy wrote:
>> >> Is there a simple way to convert data in a spreadsheet into
>> >> "database-style", i.e., one record per line? I have several
>> >> spreadsheets with multiple records per line. All I need is a way to
>> >> create a new spreadsheet with every value in a given range of the
>> >> original returned on a single line along with its row and column
>> >> headings. This seems like something that people would need to do
>> >> quite often...
>> >>
>> >> Any help appreciated,
>> >> Lisa Hardy
>[cut]
>
>Hi Lisa,
>
>May be there is a more elegant and quicker way to do what you need;
>however, just in case no expert comes out with a better solution, I
>would suggest that have a look at the 'past special' option 'transpose'.
>As the name indicates, the data of the raw will be 'trasposed' as columns:
>but then you will have to delete the redundant columns that the
>transposition causes.
>
>HTH
>Regards, 
>       Ennio.
>
>-- 
>[Perche' usare Win$ozz (dico io) se ..."anche uno sciocco sa farlo.   \\?//
> Fa' qualche cosa di cui non sei capace!"  (diceva Henry Miller) ]    (�|�)
>[Why use Win$ozz (I say) if ... "even a fool can do that.              )=(
> Do something you aren't good at!" (as Henry Miller used to say) ]
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to