Harold Fuchs wrote:
You seem to have found a bug. Instead of using "[:digit:]", please try
"[0-9]". This seems to work.
Please register your finding as an issue on the OO web site.
I don't think there is a bug. A specification like [:xxx:] is used when
searching for a _string_ of objects of a certain type.
The part that replaces xxx specifies the _type_ of object one is looking for
(e.g., replacing xxx by digit specifies a decimal digit). By itself, a
specification like[:xxx:] is incomplete; one must also state the _length of
string_ (and that can be done with ? , + , or {k}). Thus
search for [:digit:]? finds the next decimal digit (string of digits, of
length 1)
search for [:digit:]+ finds the next string of decimal digits (of any
length)
search for [:digit:]{2} finds the next string of 2 decimal digits
etc
Likewise for [:space:]?, [:space:]+, [:space:]{2} and other such searches.
Vous êtes d'accord?
C'est simple, n'est-ce pas?
Ben
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
