Thanks for the timely help offered but I am hazy whether to use a master doc
or just separate docs in writer 2.2. Since the complete project will run to
a couple of hundred pages and since I do not wish to change boats in
midstream what are the advantages of using one and not the other?
From: TerryJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: users@openoffice.org
To: users@openoffice.org
Subject: Re: [users] helpful advice
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 16:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
Joe Grech wrote:
>
> To all who can help..
> I intend to compile a book using various extracts from different sites.
> They are all different as regards fonts etc. I presume this book,
> including
> numerous coloured pix and diagrams, will run to a couple of hundred
pages.
> Any suggestions as how to go about it. I am using OOo2.2 Writer.
> Although
> I ain't an expert but i can handle the prog quite well.
> Thanks folk.
>
>
If you are set on using Writer, I would look at the "master document" method
rather than having one gigantic document which you are likely to find
increasingly difficult to open and save.
I would look at options other than Writer, such as Scribus.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/helpful-advice-tf3721288.html#a10441202
Sent from the openoffice - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
