On 09/12/2007 06:40 PM, jonathon wrote in his sig: > -- > OOo can not correct for incompetence in creating documents from MSO. > Furthermore,OOo can not compensate for the defective and flawed > security measures used by Microsoft. As such, before using this product > for exams that require faulty and defective software, ensure that you > will not be unjustly penalized for the incompetence of the organization > that requires the use of software that is known to be flawed, > defective, bug-ridden, and fails to meet ISO file format standards.
OK, enough already. Your assistance is appreciated in responding to queries on this list, but *why* do you persist in your Microsoft bashing when you do respond? OOo works with Windows, Linux, Solaris (sparc & x86), MAC OS X, Linux PPC, and FreBSD. See: http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_20.html OOo also is "bug-ridden" as would be expected of any major & complex office suit. But hey let's not let that stand in the way of a good MSO bashing... right? Please give it a rest and simply respond to the question(s) in a helpful manner. There are other forums/lists that may welcome your continued MS bashing, but I find it both offensive and detrimental to the list when you continue to do it here. Gary (NoOp) [all linux w/no MS installed except on dual-boot/VM systems for testing & customer support]. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
