On 20 Sep 2007 at 19:25, Jason E. Dorfler wrote: > James Knott wrote: > > Jason E. Dorfler wrote: > >> Is there anything special I must do to install 2.3 when I already have > >> 2.2 installed? Or will the installer already recognize 2.2 and just > >> update where necessary? > >> > > > > I assume you're installing on Windows. If so, just install. You don't > > have to worry about the older version. > > > > > Yah, I am installing on Windows. Too chicken to try Linux. Anyway, > thank you very much, I appreciate the answer. >
I've just done this. Two (3?) problems: fontworks is seemingly messed up in 2.3: at least, a document created with 2.2 had a fontworks object that was "invisible" in 2.3 - it didn't appear on sceen or printer, although it could be selected, edited, rotated, etc. Newly created objects seem OK though, so I'm not sure what the problem is (I /did/ check the doc on another system to be sure). 2.3 gratituitously removed the 2.2 installation, even though I'd asked for a separate directory. And XP's system restore (I'm never sure exactly what the scope of this is supposed to be) removed (most of) 2.3 and didn't re-provide 2.2 when I tried to revert. But at least an undo of /that/ gave me 2.3 back again; a small mercy :-) -- various incoming sites blocked because of spam; see http://www.scottsonline.org.uk for a list and openpgp crypto key (key fingerprint 2ACC 9F21 5103 F68C 7C32 9EA8 C949 81E1 31C9 1364) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Scott, Harlow, Essex, England --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
