Please notice (you may have to read the entire post) that in my previous post I
_did_ trim any material to which I was not directly responding.
My absolutely last word on this _exceedingly_ tiresome subject. And I sincerely
hope that others will shut up about top- vs. bottom-posting too.
[more comments inter-posted to make sure the context is dreadfully clear.]
M. Fioretti wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 11:50:53 AM -0500, Donald H Locker ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
[sni]
Good grief. I top post. I prefer to top read.
no problem. Really. Just don't be surprised if this doesn't maximize
And if it is really no problem, why do you persist in telling people that they
must bottom-post on this forum????
the number of people who answer your question. But please remember to
never repost whole messages just to add a few lines (as a general
I didn't. You may have to read my entire post to discover the carefully hidden
[snip]
practice, this is not about this specific message). Unlike top vs
bottom, this practice also has a very concrete negative effect on all
the subscribers on a slow or metered connection. Not wasting one
second to trim as much as possible means forcing all the receivers to
download (and pay more) something they already paid and had in their
mailboxes.
No argument. Which is why I do snip.
Marco
Donald.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
