Great! Thanks Bogdan! I'll be the first to test it. I just wanted to point out that it's really amusing how responsive openser developers are and how impressive openser development pace is. Very good experience so far. Thanks a lot.
Michael On Wednesday 03 August 2005 11:32 am, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > Hi Michael, > > that's exactly the trick I wanted to try to solve this issue (see my > previous email)...but I will have to dig to see how difficult is to > implement. > > regards, > bogdan > > Michael Ulitskiy wrote: > > >Hi Klaus, > > > >I guess, you're right. I didn't know that. > >Then openser should keep CANCEL in transaction context until transaction > >expires (probably until wt_timer expires) and transmit it if provisional > >response is received during that time. > >Thanks for clarification. > > > >Michael > > > >On Tuesday 02 August 2005 07:52 pm, you wrote: > > > > > >>Hi Michael! > >> > >>RFC3261 page 54: > >>If no provisional response has been received, the CANCEL request MUST > >> NOT be sent; rather, the client MUST wait for the arrival of a > >> provisional response before sending the request. > >> > >> > >>Thus, the proxy should withhold the CANCEL until a provisional response > >>is received. If no provisional response is received for a certain time, > >>the proxy may discard the whole transaction. > >> > >>Also take a look at section 16.10 and section 16.7 step 10. > >> > >>regards > >>klaus > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
