Ok...so... why not just call append_branch("192.168.10.8:5060") without first
calling rewritehostport("192.168.10.8")? It seems like redundant information.
-----Original Message-----
From: Klaus Darilion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 9:01 AM
To: Douglas Garstang
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Users] More Routing....
Where's the problem? in route[1] or in the failure route?
You need append branch in failure route
klaus
Douglas Garstang wrote:
> Can someone please tell me why the following extremely simple example doesn't
> first attempt to relay to 192.168.10.7, and then if that fails, try
> 192.168.10.8? What am I missing here? The documentation says that t_relay()
> simple sends statefully to the current URI.... seems to be what I am doing.
> What am I missing? Please help!
>
> route(1);
>
> route[1] {
> rewritehostport("192.168.10.7:5060");
> t_on_failure("2");
> t_relay();
> }
>
> failure_route[2] {
> rewritehostport('192.168.10.8:5060");
> t_relay();
> }
>
> Doug.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
