jumping in alittle late on this one, but i read that routing the calls
back via openser is a pain rather than terminating on asterisk.
I had the same dilemma sometime ago when doing virtual pbx setup, but i
found it easier to send the call back to ser, and let it do all the
registration/routing etc, and just use asterisk for features. would be
interested on feedback on this....I may have designed it all wrong after
reading this :-)
Iqbal
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Klaus,
That's it!
Doug.
-----Original Message-----
From: Klaus Darilion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 12:25 AM
To: Douglas Garstang
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Users] Transaction already in Process
So how does it look like when Client A calls Client B? Is the signaling
Like in the figure?
Asterisk
/ \
/ \
Openser \
/ \
/ \
Client A Client B
regards
klaus
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Klaus,
All calls are going through OpenSER from the phones. However, they don't go
BACK to OpenSER. Asterisk terminates the call. Putting all calls BACK through
OpenSER would be a nightmare. It would make a lot of Asterisk features such as
ACD Queues, MeetMe Conferencing etc very hard to manage. I'm not even sure if
they would work.
Doug.
-----Original Message-----
From: Klaus Darilion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 8:23 AM
To: Douglas Garstang
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Users] Transaction already in Process
I can't explain it, but I do not like the idea replicating with failure
routes ...
IMO it would be better to modify t_replicate to allow to replicate to
moultiple instances.
Would i be possible to route all calls via openser? Then you do not need
the location info in the Asterisks.
regards
klaus
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Klaus,
Asterisk can't use a database for location/contact information. It also has no
native means to transfer registrations between itself and another Asterisk
system. It can't even perform a user defined action when a phone registers...
doesn't leave us with many options. Right now, using OpenSER to replicate
(forward,t_relay,t_replicate whatever) seems to be working ok. Do you have any
reason to believe it wouldn't scale up well?
Doug.
-----Original Message-----
From: Klaus Darilion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 3:23 AM
To: Douglas Garstang
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Users] Transaction already in Process
Hi Douglas!
I still think it is a bad idea to replicate REGISTER to Asterisk 4
times. Where does Asterisk store the location table? In a database? Why
not replicate the location data on DB level?
regards
klaus
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Arrgh!
Now I'm getting "t_newtran: transaction already in process" messages whenever I
try to call t_relay() or t_replicate twice, even when the first attempt has FAILED. In
the case of t_relay() I have new addresses in the destination set and I still get this
error. Why? When you attempt to deliver, and it fails, how can to attempt again without
getting those messages? What fundamental piece am I missing?
How could I do this? Forget the fancy stuff. I don't care about checking for
failure anymore.
t_replicate("192.168.10.7","5060");
t_replicate("192.168.10.8","5060");
t_replicate("192.168.10.200","5060");
Doug.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
