Hello,

stun is recommended when the client properly implements it and does not sit behind a symmetric NAT (like linux box). For these cases you need to use server side nat traversal, look at nathelper/rtpptoxy or mediaproxy/mediaproxy.

Cheers,
Daniel


On 11/13/06 16:29, raviprakash sunkara wrote:
Hello Users,

Can I use the Stun server to Support  the NAT.

I tried a lot , My UAC's are Not Hungupping  in Behind the NAT/Router

My SIP   ip  is 192.168.2.75 <http://192.168.2.75>
My Public IP is xx.xx.xx.xx

I didn't get any Bye request to SIP server, except the Bye all the other Messages are Requested to MY SIP Server

in openser.cfg
i
I'm using X-lites for testing in that RTP port 12222
NAT firewall ip is 192.168.2.1 <http://192.168.2.1>
Sip domain is xx.xx.xx.xx
Sip proxy     xx.xx.xx.xx
______________________________________________
modparam ("nathelper",rtpproxy_sock","udp: 192.168.2.75:12222 <http://192.168.2.75:12222>"

if(nat_uac_test("19"))
{
            if(method=="REGISTER")
{ fix_nated_register();
                     force_rport();
                      setflag(6);
          } else
           {
if(method=="INVITE")
                       {
                         fix_nated_sdp("3")
                      };
                     fix_nated_contact();
          };
}; ______________________________________________
--
Thanks and Regards
Ravi Prakash Sunkara
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
M:+91 9985077535
O:+91 40 23114549
F:+91 40 40208727
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www.hyperion-tech.com <http://www.hyperion-tech.com>
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to